Look, I get it, Viruses are scary so you pretend they don't exist. And papers showing a scary one has been concocted in a lab scare you more so even though you dont believe in viruses you feel the need to discredit the authors with no proof other than it wasn't blinded or peer reviewed (yet) , and claim he felt the need to make up a scary virus and be accused of GOF and risk his job to get published so as to keep his job.
Never mind that this science can always get published because it was funded by NIAID and the more importantly the fact that WT + Omicron Chimera does not change its function compared to Omicron or WT is interesting in itself
I no longer agree. It occurs to me that Virus Denial allows people to deny the existence of the Holocaust perpetrated by Virus GoF. In a sense its not unlike Holocaust Denial which denies Jews and others were killed by those who espoused a harmful ideology. This is going on under our noses and the deniers laugh off Boston University GoF experiments as harmless because they deny viruses exist.
I wont debate you on Virus Existence . I gave you a chance and you walked away. Keep walking. You will need to discover the truth on your own if you dare open your mind.
But you should ask yourself, what if you are wrong?. And what if psychopaths are using them to do harm. First they came for the Elderly. Then they came for the Poor and infirm. Then they came for me. Sound familiar?
Anyways, believe what you will, but denial of whats real can cause harm IMO
"Virus denial," a term of propaganda designed to smear by association with Holocaust denial, was probably cooked up in Pfizer's PR laboratories -- their only labs doing any valid science, although sadly it's psychological science and sadly you seem to have fallen for it.
It is enjoyable to watch the less reflective members of the vaccine cult go after what they call "vaccine denial." Perhaps they are letting slip that vaccines are causing a Holocaust.
Meanwhile, we still need a name for your group. Virus promoters? Virus pushers?
The elites only care that we still believe in viruses, so that they can control us, ID us, mask and muzzle us, continually lock us down, destroy our small businesses, isolate the elderly to murder them and make $trillions from unnecessary and harmful testing, anti-virals and vaccines.
There absolutely was not crickets. There were 2 replies and an edit ;THE EXPERIMENTS AND PATHOLOGISTS WERE NOT BLINDED. Analysis of symptoms and histological features is very subjective. Which is why such extraordinary lengths must be gone to double blind all experiments. All the symptoms and histological observations can also be explained by the trauma of the experiment. THERE WERE NO CONTROLS.
The mice; 6 for ‘WT’, 10 for ‘Omi-S’ (which includes engineered and manipulated proteins with unknown effect), and 10 for ‘Omicron’ were not injected with viruses. They were injected with cell cultures made with samples containing thousands of biologically active substances, including bacterial toxins and proteins involved in the stimulation of inflammation and fever to expel toxins, from patients with varying degrees of symptoms. The ‘WT’ culture severe symptoms, the ‘omicron’ very mild, and Omi-S with the manipulated ‘spike’ ie p180-200 which is known to cause inflammation.
6/6 WT and 8/10 Omi-S and none of the Omicron were euthanised after observations of clinical scores of criteria such as ruffled fur and unresponsiveness by 8 days post injection. It did not show that Omicron showed no signs of illness.
The fact that the experiment was not blinded is sufficient to explain the differences in the observed subjective criteria leading to euthanasia in this very small, non-peer reviewed study. However the differences in the amount and make up of biologically active substances present in the samples used to make the cell cultures would also explain them. THIS TINY STUDY IS NOT PEER REVIEWED.
Nonsense, outside clinical trials or dx test evaluation they are rare except in cases where the researchers may have a clear bias in the outcome and even then only if the study is funded enough to take on the added costs. I have read many studies related to COVID research and only Clinical Trials or studies on PCR test validation are blinded.
In this case the researchers learn something no matter what is the outcome. Its not like they can sell Super Omicron on the market for a higher price to Biological Terrorists if they kill more mice .
30 years. From Technician to Lab Director then Global Technical Director. Only biological lab work was with Typhoid , we used it to test the effectiveness of bacteriocides. Mostly electrical, mechanical and chemical testing.
then you'll know that it's all about getting papers published in order to get funding and keep a job. who would be interested in a paper showing no difference between samples?
PS. controls are always mentioned, even if they inadequate.
Look, I get it, Viruses are scary so you pretend they don't exist. And papers showing a scary one has been concocted in a lab scare you more so even though you dont believe in viruses you feel the need to discredit the authors with no proof other than it wasn't blinded or peer reviewed (yet) , and claim he felt the need to make up a scary virus and be accused of GOF and risk his job to get published so as to keep his job.
Never mind that this science can always get published because it was funded by NIAID and the more importantly the fact that WT + Omicron Chimera does not change its function compared to Omicron or WT is interesting in itself
Got it
So you've found a solution to virology's fatal flaws? Do tell!
https://fullbroadside.substack.com/p/virologys-fatal-flaw
I no longer agree. It occurs to me that Virus Denial allows people to deny the existence of the Holocaust perpetrated by Virus GoF. In a sense its not unlike Holocaust Denial which denies Jews and others were killed by those who espoused a harmful ideology. This is going on under our noses and the deniers laugh off Boston University GoF experiments as harmless because they deny viruses exist.
I wont debate you on Virus Existence . I gave you a chance and you walked away. Keep walking. You will need to discover the truth on your own if you dare open your mind.
But you should ask yourself, what if you are wrong?. And what if psychopaths are using them to do harm. First they came for the Elderly. Then they came for the Poor and infirm. Then they came for me. Sound familiar?
Anyways, believe what you will, but denial of whats real can cause harm IMO
"Virus denial," a term of propaganda designed to smear by association with Holocaust denial, was probably cooked up in Pfizer's PR laboratories -- their only labs doing any valid science, although sadly it's psychological science and sadly you seem to have fallen for it.
It is enjoyable to watch the less reflective members of the vaccine cult go after what they call "vaccine denial." Perhaps they are letting slip that vaccines are causing a Holocaust.
Meanwhile, we still need a name for your group. Virus promoters? Virus pushers?
The elites only care that we still believe in viruses, so that they can control us, ID us, mask and muzzle us, continually lock us down, destroy our small businesses, isolate the elderly to murder them and make $trillions from unnecessary and harmful testing, anti-virals and vaccines.
There absolutely was not crickets. There were 2 replies and an edit ;THE EXPERIMENTS AND PATHOLOGISTS WERE NOT BLINDED. Analysis of symptoms and histological features is very subjective. Which is why such extraordinary lengths must be gone to double blind all experiments. All the symptoms and histological observations can also be explained by the trauma of the experiment. THERE WERE NO CONTROLS.
The mice; 6 for ‘WT’, 10 for ‘Omi-S’ (which includes engineered and manipulated proteins with unknown effect), and 10 for ‘Omicron’ were not injected with viruses. They were injected with cell cultures made with samples containing thousands of biologically active substances, including bacterial toxins and proteins involved in the stimulation of inflammation and fever to expel toxins, from patients with varying degrees of symptoms. The ‘WT’ culture severe symptoms, the ‘omicron’ very mild, and Omi-S with the manipulated ‘spike’ ie p180-200 which is known to cause inflammation.
6/6 WT and 8/10 Omi-S and none of the Omicron were euthanised after observations of clinical scores of criteria such as ruffled fur and unresponsiveness by 8 days post injection. It did not show that Omicron showed no signs of illness.
The fact that the experiment was not blinded is sufficient to explain the differences in the observed subjective criteria leading to euthanasia in this very small, non-peer reviewed study. However the differences in the amount and make up of biologically active substances present in the samples used to make the cell cultures would also explain them. THIS TINY STUDY IS NOT PEER REVIEWED.
Jo
I think it's you with your fingers in your ears
I”ll update to reflect your comment and my response
😺
Blinding is always required in all experiments.
Nonsense, outside clinical trials or dx test evaluation they are rare except in cases where the researchers may have a clear bias in the outcome and even then only if the study is funded enough to take on the added costs. I have read many studies related to COVID research and only Clinical Trials or studies on PCR test validation are blinded.
In this case the researchers learn something no matter what is the outcome. Its not like they can sell Super Omicron on the market for a higher price to Biological Terrorists if they kill more mice .
have you ever worked in a lab?
30 years. From Technician to Lab Director then Global Technical Director. Only biological lab work was with Typhoid , we used it to test the effectiveness of bacteriocides. Mostly electrical, mechanical and chemical testing.
then you'll know that it's all about getting papers published in order to get funding and keep a job. who would be interested in a paper showing no difference between samples?
PS. controls are always mentioned, even if they inadequate.