You're really reaching here. Being for health and fitness is subversive? Tucker Carlson's dad was CIA? He's upfront about that, it helped inform him. I'm a very different person from my parents. From all evidence, so is Tucker.
One side is for censorship and tearing up the first amendment.
One side is for disarming the public and tearing up the 2nd amendment.
One side is for tossing aside merit and forcibly bestowing success based on identity politics.
One side is for forced administration of invasive medical treatments.
One side is universally for demonizing any foreign country, and its leaders, who don't capitulate to their every whim.
The side of evil and tyranny described above is NOT Trump's side. Trump's side opposes every one of these atrocities. I'm no Trump groupie, he's flawed. But so are we all. At this point, waging an anti-Trump campaign is the most destructive thing you can possibly do.
Just pointing out the similarities. Obviously Health is a good thing, but when his own agency said EF/EMR was hazardous Trump ignored it.
<2018-a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. >
He rushed a new technology of vaccine through and did not do anything to make it easier to get drugs like HCQ, his agencies pushed unhealthy masking of children and he called for unhealthy lockdowns
As for Tucker he applied to work at the CIA and the CIA has long infiltrated Media and no doubt Alt Media today. He may be working for them now. No way to know.
Trump calls to punish TV stations for editorial devisions and pull their licenses, and his calls to stop any criticism of Israel by calling it Hate Speech, and his history of suing people for libel does not sound like a free speech advocate . His agencies were behind COVID and Election censorship even if he didnt personally get involved
The other side is not advocating to do anything about the 2nd amendment. Trumps record is mixed
I don’t agree with identity politics and forced medical treatments, or abortion but these are mostly state issues. A President can do little about them. Trump had 4 years to do something and most of the mandates except the DoD mandate came from the private sector. DoD has a history of such mandates. Bidens mandate was to test the unvaxxed worker, not to take the vaccine
As for demonizing any foreign country, and its leaders, who don't capitulate to their every whim, you have defined Trump.
I have made my case against Trump in many posts. Cant rehash it here. Not that the other side are Angels but they are the clear cut Lesser Evil
I look forward to all the excuses you make for him when things turn south
Ha, I took a Logic course 50 years ago. Sat for one class. Next time I showed up was final and aced it. If B some are A. As for the consequent. I simply showed comparisons with past events by a guy who seemed interested in a past villain speaking and acting in a similar manner, and warning history can repeat
You're really reaching here. Being for health and fitness is subversive? Tucker Carlson's dad was CIA? He's upfront about that, it helped inform him. I'm a very different person from my parents. From all evidence, so is Tucker.
One side is for censorship and tearing up the first amendment.
One side is for disarming the public and tearing up the 2nd amendment.
One side is for tossing aside merit and forcibly bestowing success based on identity politics.
One side is for forced administration of invasive medical treatments.
One side is universally for demonizing any foreign country, and its leaders, who don't capitulate to their every whim.
The side of evil and tyranny described above is NOT Trump's side. Trump's side opposes every one of these atrocities. I'm no Trump groupie, he's flawed. But so are we all. At this point, waging an anti-Trump campaign is the most destructive thing you can possibly do.
Just pointing out the similarities. Obviously Health is a good thing, but when his own agency said EF/EMR was hazardous Trump ignored it.
<2018-a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. >
He rushed a new technology of vaccine through and did not do anything to make it easier to get drugs like HCQ, his agencies pushed unhealthy masking of children and he called for unhealthy lockdowns
As for Tucker he applied to work at the CIA and the CIA has long infiltrated Media and no doubt Alt Media today. He may be working for them now. No way to know.
Trump calls to punish TV stations for editorial devisions and pull their licenses, and his calls to stop any criticism of Israel by calling it Hate Speech, and his history of suing people for libel does not sound like a free speech advocate . His agencies were behind COVID and Election censorship even if he didnt personally get involved
The other side is not advocating to do anything about the 2nd amendment. Trumps record is mixed
I don’t agree with identity politics and forced medical treatments, or abortion but these are mostly state issues. A President can do little about them. Trump had 4 years to do something and most of the mandates except the DoD mandate came from the private sector. DoD has a history of such mandates. Bidens mandate was to test the unvaxxed worker, not to take the vaccine
As for demonizing any foreign country, and its leaders, who don't capitulate to their every whim, you have defined Trump.
I have made my case against Trump in many posts. Cant rehash it here. Not that the other side are Angels but they are the clear cut Lesser Evil
I look forward to all the excuses you make for him when things turn south
If you oppose communism and you're aware of Hitler, you might be a fascist.
He has literally devolved to the "Hitler drank water" meme.
A true Fascist would be against Communism. Not everyone against Communism is a Fascist. Logic is lost on some people
Strawman arguments would suggest your grasp of logic is lacking. Keep fearmongering.
That all you got😂
Pete, given "all A are B", what statements can you derive from "If B"?
Then admit you're committing the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent. Or stop talking as if you understand logic.
Ha, I took a Logic course 50 years ago. Sat for one class. Next time I showed up was final and aced it. If B some are A. As for the consequent. I simply showed comparisons with past events by a guy who seemed interested in a past villain speaking and acting in a similar manner, and warning history can repeat