8 Comments
Jul 26Liked by Pete Lincoln

Many good thoughts, thanks. This:

"only 8 smallish states avoided Lockdowns"

has implications that seem beyond those on my side of most everything else, by which I mean pro-freedom, anti-tyranny. Why is it my side seems to think there is no such thing as too many people, and any effort to limit population is bad, bad, bad? How can they not notice, as in the case of the "8 smallish states" that when population density is lower, freedom and sanity flourish. As population density rises, insane leftist, authoritarian thinking takes over? Just look at our cities. Is there a single large city in the US that is not a cesspool of insanity and self-destruction?

I am firmly on the side of "fewer people good, more people bad". So, I agree with the elites on this one point. In fact, it seems as obvious to me as it was to remain unjabbed. Which is to say Really Friggin' Obvious.

That does NOT mean killing anybody, making growing old so unpleasant oldsters off themselves, or ANY arm-twisting to impact population. There are plenty of benign, even beneficial ways. Prosperity itself, after a point, which the USA and Europe had reached, does it all by itself. Opening the borders "fixed" that, which is another story.

Expand full comment
Jul 26Liked by Pete Lincoln

Have you ever come across Donald Marshall in your internet travels.

He would argue the elete have had effective immortality for decades. Using soulstone microchips(?) and consciousness transfer.

He would say the tricky part is selling it to the public and all the transhumanism technology has already been created, it's just that it can't be released. Perhaps because they need to do a depopulation first or because normal people don't like the idea of cheating death and living indefinitely on technology.

They talk about transhumanism as a religion but it may just be a way to avoid death and continue a life of debauchery.

Expand full comment
author

No. Actually, I don't know where I said they achieved immortality as individuals. They seek to achieve it via Transhumanism and a Collective Singularity

Expand full comment
Jul 26·edited Jul 26Liked by Pete Lincoln

I don't believe the elite have achieved immortality. But, I don't know that for sure. In support of your theory, I see pictures of lesser elites like Soros, Fauci, Biden, Schwab looking old and shaky, and growing more so over time. But, moving up the food chain, the shadowy figures associated with real power, with names like Rothschild, never seem to be pictured, anywhere. Hmmm.

Expand full comment
author

I never said they achieved immortality individually, only that they hope to achieve it

Expand full comment

I know. I was replying to Stephan, who referred to Marshall arguing the elites already achieved immortality via microchips and consciousness transfer.

Expand full comment

Well said Peter, as one boomer to another. There is however an angle that you might want to think about, not that you need another rabbit hole to dive in to.

That would be the study of a cyclical catastrophe that is said to occur roughly every 12k years. Check out suspiciousobservers.org for a wealth of information. If there is truth to the theory, the so called elite surely are aware of it. My theory is that said elite are really just top of the visible heap, the real controllers have been at it through multiple catastrophes and it is they who are driving the boat upon which these visible demons are floating, undoubtedly furthering whatever the really long term objectives are.

Thanks,

Pat

Expand full comment
author

There does seem to be a pattern of social turbulence and shocks followed by periods of stability. Not locked into 12 years though. It seems more varianle

Bad Periods-US

1913 (1 yr)

1917-1919 (3 yrs)

1929-1945 (15 yrs)

1963-1980 (17 yrs)

1989-1993 (5 yrs)

2001-2010 (10 yrs)

2020- (?)

I guess each generation of Elites generate their own projects to achieve “progress” in achieving their vision of a New World Order, which changes over time

Expand full comment