Some of your sources are poor, unreliable. So, despite my agreeing with everything you say (except your clear errors) I've unfortunately decided not to link to your articles as sources in the ones that I do. This was a difficult decision to make, but I value methodology even more than findings, because bad methodology produces no findings but only 'findings' -- and I stay away from that like the plague. Eric Zuesse
Some of your sources are poor, unreliable. So, despite my agreeing with everything you say (except your clear errors) I've unfortunately decided not to link to your articles as sources in the ones that I do. This was a difficult decision to make, but I value methodology even more than findings, because bad methodology produces no findings but only 'findings' -- and I stay away from that like the plague. Eric Zuesse
So you don't like the NYT, Zero Hedge, Intercept. Got it. They all misreport as much as they report, but not everything they report is false
And your sources (which ones) refute my limited snap shot of what these sources reported? In what way.?
Remember, when a link is provided as a source for what Is reported, this is not to be taken that I agree with everything in that link or that source.