Confessions on the Moon Landing
Filmmaker T. Patrick Murray allegedly interviewed Stanley Kubrick three days before his death in March 1999. He was forced to sign an 88-page NDA to keep the contents of the interview a secret for 15 years.
Below is a transcript from the interview with Stanley Kubrick (released in 2015) , in which the 2001 Space Odyssey Director admits on camera that, “the moon landings ALL were faked, and that I was the person who filmed it.”
In the interview, the alleged Stanley Kubrick confesses that:
Kubrick: I perpetrated a huge fraud on the American public, which I am now about to detail, involving the United States government and NASA, that the moon landings were faked, that the moon landings ALL were faked , and that I was the person who filmed it.
Murray: Ok. (laughs) What are you talking … You’re serious. Ok.
Kubrick: I’m serious. Dead serious. Yes, it was fake.
Murray: Why are you telling the world? Why does the world need to know that the moon landings aren’t real and you faked them?
Kubrick: I consider them to be my masterpiece.
Murray: And you can’ t take credit, or even talk about …
Kubrick: Well, I am now …
Murray: So, you can’t talk to Roger Ebert about it. Does that frustrate you? Why did they have to fake it? Why would they have to do that?
Kubrick: Because it is impossible to get there … 2001 was very ambitious, but that’s not to say that faking the moon landing was not ambitious. But I learned things from making 2001, and that’s why I got this gig in the first place.
Murray: That makes sense
Kubrick: Well, it was easy for me, because I didn’t think a whole lot about the morality of it. But I didn’t. And I could see that Neil [Armstrong] was, he was bothered by it.
This video has been circulating online since at least August 2015 and is one of several clips purportedly showing Kubrick talking about his alleged involvement in faking the U.S. moon landings. While there are various edits of this infamous interview circulating on YouTube, the videos all originated with a new film from T. Patrick Murray titled Shooting Kubrick.
Is it really him? We don’t get to see his whole face for some strange reason which is suspicious. His beard is grayer and longer than the few photos that are available, and we cant see his full forehead
Confession Video Snapshot
Other Pics (he gave few interviews)
Another
And one more
It does sound like him IMO
I am skeptical but perhaps Stanley wanted to confess but still leave room for doubt (after all, he may have feared retribution taken against his surviving family and friends if it was too convincing)
And the timing of his death shortly after the alleged interview is suspicious, although if fake we don’t really know when it was done. He looks a bit the worse for wear (drugs/booze) but you can imagine if it looked like Stanley might blow the whistle (assuming this is true) he would be quickly taken care of, and if real he certainly was blowing the whistle,
I have never really looked into the Moon Landing and always accepted it as true. I know from Thomas Gold who was contracted as a NASA Scientist and who promoted the Abiotic Theory of Oils Origins that he thought the Moons surface was covered by very thick and light moon dust (jokingly called Gold Dust) that may cause landing craft to sink or make it difficult to relaunch afterlanding.
Our inability to return to the Moon quickly with todays technology and computers is also suspicious, as was the fact the original tapes that supposedly received the data of the moon landing transmissions were disappeared.
Something to consider is this. Could Kubricks alleged confession have been sanctioned by NASA/Military? After all, if we do “return” to the moon one day and that in fact becomes the first landing of Man on the Moon, those who make that happen will want credit. Since it would happen only after the perpetrators of what would be the Greatest Fraud ever (if true) were long dead and buried, think of Kubricks confession as planting the seed for acceptance of this.
I expect by that time the US reputation will be so tarnished, if it even still exists beyond a small portion of a Planetary Republic with a Global Space Force , that the world will readily accept this Revision of History (true or not).
I am on the fence on this one. After the last 21 years my Eyes are Wide Open to almost any accepted Truth being a Lie, and the most Preposterous Theory being True