Overcoming Complexity to pull off 9/11 (and COVID)

Brian Mowrey post got me thinking on this

(Over-) Complexity in Conspiracy

Personally, I feel pulling off COVID was far more complex than pulling off 9/11 because you needed to involve many non-Federal government and private sector actors, not just in US but globally, and you had social media to contend with unlike the early days of 9/11.

With 9/11 , like COVID , you needed a patsy.   9/11 used Al Qaeda, COVID used China. Patsy does not mean they were not involved. Al Qaeda was easy, we created them in Afghanistan (Operation Cyclone) and used them in the Balkans in the 90’s and we had already preconditioned the public that they were a terrorist organization that hated us (they did) with several well publicized attacks.  

Organizing them to conduct an attack on the US was easy using Saudi handlers.  I am doubtful the hijackers knew they were going on a suicide mission since they were not overly religious, and probably thought they were just hijacking the planes to hold hostages.

Flight training would not have been hard given Afghanistans airline Ariana was controlled by Al Qaeda and the Saudis could have helped train with their fleet of Boeings.  The training in US was to set up the narrative and protect the Saudis. In any event, the planes were likely set up to be taken over via Remote Control.

Interestingly, months before 9/11 Fox aired an episode of Lone Gunmen (X-Files spinoff) with a story where terrorists take over a plane via remote control to smash it into the WTC .

I have no proof remote control was done but according to experienced pilots the route taken by the plane that hit the Pentagon was all but impossible w/o an expert pilot (or remote controller ).

Ok, thats the easy part, and they needed some help from FBI and Immigration Officers but thats easy. Federal workers with a pension on their horizon are easy to control and silence (although stories did come out).

Also, as I proceed with this keep in mind whistleblowers cant be heard if the MSM wont show them blowing the whistle. MSM was totally controlled and other than some blogs that were easily discredited and small outlets nobody was allowed to question the narrative.

Now we get to the tricky part.  How to get the military to stand down once the 4 planes were known to be hijacked. First, you arrange beforehand to send them off on Military Exercises simulating a similar scenario, and second, you have the top brass of the military on board with 9/11. Say a promise of more funding and wars in their future, and promotions to boot. You dont get promoted to General or Admiral without passing a loyalty test and that test is not a measure of loyalty to the Constitution.

Secrets in the Military are relatively easy to keep. Everything is compartmentalized, need to know only. National Security Laws keep those who know anything quiet.  The fact the Military and Intelligence Agencies were involved bodes well for the success of complex operations (both are involved with Operation COVID)

So now we have secured the airspace. The remote controlled aircraft will be permitted to reach their intended destinations. The Pennsylvania crash may have been intended as a distraction to provide us with some heroes. Every good story needs heroes.

What next? For the sake of brevity I will focus only on WTC buildings.

Flying the planes into the buildings was the easy part. Ok, maybe easy is being used to easily here but getting them to fall down was a bit harder. You see, these buildings were strong with thick steel beams. Steel doesn’t melt or even soften in fires at normal atmosphere with air and office combustibles as fuel.  Plus these were high floor impacts. The strongest part of the buildings frames is the lower section of the building which holds most of the weight.   Even if the structure failed at the point of impact, that wouldn’t have caused the demolition we saw from top to bottom.

Clearly, to get both WTC I and II to be demolished within an hour of impact, required explosives. The same for WTC 7 which was demolished 7 hours later.   Explosives were needed.

Before we get to how, lets review more evidence supporting explosives

1. Testimony by first responders. Many reports of explosives

2. High temperatures at Ground Zero for more than a month, hot enough to be seen by satellite IR and hot enough to burn the soles off your shoes. Thermite (used in explosives) does that

How?  Thats a difficult question. Lets look at Means, Opportunity and Motive

The owner of WTC was Larry Silverstein. Months before 9/11 he took out a 99 year lease on WTC 1/2. This was after the Port Authority was rejected by the Cities Environmental Department to do a controlled demolition on both buildings because of asbestos. Port authority wanted to rebuild in the face of tenants leaving in favor of more modern buildings. Yet Larry saw value where the Port Authority did not.

One of the first things Larry did was upgrade insurance of the two Towers to include terrorists attacks.  He either already had it for WTC7 or did the same for this building.

CIA connected Kroll Associates was in charge of WTC security since 1993, so if you wanted access to the buildings to plant explosives you need to get past Kroll Associates and Larry Silverstein. Its not hard to imagine both being in on it if this was a Military-Intelligence Operation. Oh and by the way, a company George Bushs brother worked for handled Larrys insurance and he was on the Board of Directors at one of the Security companies responsible for WTC

Marvin Bush joined Securacom's Board of Directors in 1993, as part of new management hired when the company separated from engineering firm Burns and Roe.  The new team was capitalized by KuwAm, the D.C.-based Kuwaiti-American investment company.

Bush also served on the Board of Directors at KuwAm, along with Mishal Yousef Saud al-Sabah, Chairman of KuwAm and also a Director on Securacom's (Stratesec's) board.

The World Trade Center and the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority -- which operates Dulles -- were two of Securacom's three biggest clients in 1996 and 1997.

Stratesec (Securacom) differs from other security companies which separate the function of consultant from that of service provider.

When, following the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey began its multi-million-dollar, multiyear revamping of security in and around the Twin Towers and Buildings 4 and 5, Securacom was among numerous contractors hired in the upgrade.

Stratesec, was one of the companies that provided security at the World Trade Center up until the day of the attacks. Notably, Stratesec also provided security at Dulles International Airport, where AA 77 took off on 9/11, and also security for United Airlines, which owned two of the other three allegedly hijacked aircraft. Bush’s brother Marvin was also on the board.

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc., a reinsurance corporation on whose board Marvin Bush sat as director until November 2002, similarly benefits from terrorism insurance protections. (Bush's first year on the board at HCC coincided with his last year on the board at Stratesec.)

HCC, formerly Houston Casualty Company, carried some of the insurance for the World Trade Center. Bush remained an adviser to the chairman and the Board of Directors, as well as a member of the company's investment committee.

Thats just one of many interesting things regarding 9/11. I wrote quite a bit in the links provided in this post .

9/11 Anniversary

The other point is whatever goes up must eventually go down. I don’t know anything about building tall buildings but I would think when building them you anticipate one day they will need a controlled demolition so they likely make easy access to locations where charges may one day need to be planted.

Seems reasonable.

As to who planted the charges, this is the trickiest part of keeping it secret. Using a private company of salaried employees who come and go to set up and do the Controlled Demolition is a problem. It is here I suspect a foreign intelligence agency got involved who stood to gain from 9/11.  I will leave you to guess who.

Ok, so now a couple of buttons are pushed and 3 buildings are in dust.  Now its time for the coverup operation by thwarting any forsenic investigation.  The building debris was quickly removed and the steel sent to South Korea to be recycled. When asked if the debris was tested for explosive residues FEMA answered no, they had no reason to believe explosives were used so did no testing. How convenient. Kind of like FDA on vaccine trials.

However, knowing that in a country with many engineers there would be doubts NIST was charged with modeling the WTC I and II demolition to show how it was Natural Demolition and not GOF (Controlled) Demolition. Sound familiar?

As a famous mathematician once said give me enough free parameters (assumptions) and I can model an elephant that can fly.

They then did the same for WTC 7 which was debunked by University of Alaska Engineers

https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7

So you see, government science was corrupted before COVID

There are so many holes in the official narrative you can write a book, and many have. David Ray Griffins early books were especially helpful. However only those who can read and think can see through this, but for most people they never questioned 9/11 and still don’t, even those who question COVID

So you see, they really didn’t get away with it, they just got people to not see that the Emperor Had No Clothes, and not to speak or even think of such things. As one lady said when told about it “I wouldn’t want to believe it even if it were true”. Denial, not Religion, is the Opiate of the people.

I got banned from many blog comment sections talking about 9/11 and Climate Change (another example of science being hijacked). Censorship is not unique to COVID and Twitter.

Anyways, I believe the same people were behind 9/11 (and Anthrax) and COVID. I believe both were Government Military-Intelligence Operations conducted on behalf of a Global Corporate Elite, each a necessary step in asserting control over the Global Population. Other steps will follow. Denial will remain strong.

In any event, back to complexity. I feel 9/11 was not overly complex for a Military -Intelligence USG Operation, and botched as it was, they had MSM pretty controlled so they did not amplify the many mistakes made.  Furthermore, they played on the psychological aspects of Fear and Anger uniting people around a common enemy (Al Qaeda and Muslims in general) and feeding on one of Americas great religions (Militarism as opposed to COVIDS Scientism) to enlist support for a needless war based on more lies.

  Anyone questioning the War or 9/11 was called Unpatriotic and a supporter of Terrorists and was censored or beat up if you dared speak such thoughts in a bar of “Patriots”.  They even had their rituals, God Bless America at baseball games, Surrendering Bottled Water to TSA check points, removing shoes and submitting to full body scans, pat downs of granny in a wheel chair.  Its ok, it will keep us safe they said. They even had color coded Terror Alert Codes to warn us when the Terror Level was high,  and told us to report anyone looking suspicious.

If you cant see the parallels to what went on with COVID you aren’t trying. Instead of Doctors and Virologists on TV News-shows we had Generals and Intelligence Experts telling us what to think and why we should be afraid.

Now more on the Evils of Complexity, or what another sub-stacker calls the virtues (Law) of Occams Razor in arguing that Flu is not caused by a Virus but by Electricity

Why Flu is an electrical illness

False Dichotomies are used often. Its either one or the other, it cant be both. For example with 9/11 it was either planes or explosives,  Al Qaeda or USG Inside Jobbers,  and with COVID it was China or US GOF. In all these cases it could easily have been both

Anyways, here is what I have to say about Virus Denial. It is to COVID truth what Directed Energy Weapons Plane Deniers were to 9/11 Truth . Damaging.

Here is my take on Flu not being caused by a virus (not that there are not other contributing factors). Germ vs Terrain Theory is another False Dichotomy.

Before the age of electricity life expectancy was short and there were many epidemics of one sort of another due to poor sanitation. Much of the population was urban and in the cities there were incredible amounts of air pollution due to burning coal and wood for heat. Influenza as a viral illness was not recognized as such and outbreaks were not recorded. Flu deaths were accepted as just another illness taking away life.

As the electric age increased-and EMR/RF waves increased exponentially ever since starting in the late 19th century awareness that unique pathogens such as bacteria and other smaller things caused specific diseases. Although viruses still were not identified, such outbreaks began being recorded by newly created public health departments . These all happened in parallel. The awareness of germs, recording of outbreaks and growth in use of electricity and then radio waves.

Now it may very well that those exposed to the highest levels of EMR/RF suffer some immune suppression as a result of the exposure, or perhaps by virtue of living in a higher population density, more pollution and greater poverty, such outbreaks increased, at least until the mid 20th century when improved sanitation, nutrition and  improved living standards reduced such outbreaks.

By the 1950’s people were able to distribution between flu season and other seasons since other causes of infectious outbreaks were reduced due to reasons mentioned above and also vaccination for polio, whooping cough and diphtheria.

Nothing stopped the flu though, as a virus it mutates fast and vaccination doesn’t work well for respiratory infections. At this time we had the CDC which was tasked with recording infectious diseases and pushing vaccines so it counted flu cases and was very generous in attributing any death to flu.

So maybe we had a pandemic in 1957/1958, 1968, 2009 and maybe we didn’t.  In 1918 we had something they called Spanish Flu. This followed a supposed influenza pandemic in the late 1900’s.  The young were disproportionately affected than the elderly, possibly because the elderly had immunity from their late 1900’s exposure

This was during a World War I mind you, and many deaths were actually due to secondary bacterial infections in an age when we had no antibiotics, so it was a perfect storm. Also the Rockefeller’s were preparing crude vaccines and serums to inoculate troops and there is some speculation a new pathogen was released as a result of this work in Kansas,  which then spread East with troop mobilizations to the East Coast and then Europe

COVID of course is not Flu and kills mostly the elderly leaving younger people alone pretty much. Its not the virus killing people as much as the treatment protocols which were designed to kill. Still, even a mild cold can kill the very old and unhealthy

He made an assertion influenza does not bother the elderly and infants. This is not true. They are affected, just not disproportionately  like some other infections.  Infants are somewhat protected by relatively fewer contacts and a naive immune system where they don’t have to worry about Original Antigenic Sin or  Antibody Dependent Enhancement when affected by a strain different than their first exposure.  The elderly are partially protected due to prior immunity but they still suffer from a higher fatality rate than younger adults.

Younger adults and kids can be hard hit, especially if hit by a strain different from the first strain (Influenza A vs Influenza B), and since they tend to have many more contacts than elderly or infants are more likely to be infected

In my opinion the debate between EMR/RF causing disease vs Influenza Virus is another False Dichotomy. Coincidences aside, it may be that both play a role. Like Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory, both can be true .

Occam’s Razor is not a Law, its a Fallacy designed to prevent consideration of theories that went against established dogma. In The Meaning of Relativity, Einstein stated: “In my opinion the theory here is the logically simplest relativistic field theory that is at all possible. But this does not mean that Nature might not obey a more complex theory.”

And while your Electricity causes Flu is simple enough, explaining the conspiracy of hundreds of thousands of scientists for over a century in many different countries including enemy states who despite the incredible tools of detection today don’t even question the existence of influenza virus (many due consider the harmful effects of EMR/RF ) is quite complex .

A simple explanation can be true, but it must explain all facts, not just some facts, and a temporal association is not sufficient

That said, I do think EMR/RF plays an important role in many illnesses, and that investigating this is being suppressed by Big Tech and the Military Industrial Complex for Malthusian Purposes and to better control the population by making them weaker