9/11 Supplement

This is a nice concise supplement to my previous 9/11 post supporting explosives used in the tower, some of which I covered here.

https://open.substack.com/pub/pete843/p/911-22-years-later?r=qryrn&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

From “An Insult to Intuition”, link below

1 Some of the bodies pulled from the buildings were broken into 200 separate pieces: NY Times: Medical Examiner’s challenge

2 George Pataki, then Governor of NY, was mystified about why there was so little concrete left on at ground zero yet lower Manhattan was covered with a blanket of pulverized concrete three inches deep. Here he is on CNN:

Governor Pataki on Ground Zero

[The video might hv been taken down.

I think its this 9/21 CNN Video but I cant play it on my iphone]

http://edition.cnn.com/video/us/2001/09/21/hemmer.gov.cnn.med.html

3 CNN reports that it took more than three months to put out the fires despite that Ground Zero was flooded with millions of gallons of water. Fires need an oxygen source. Fires can only burn underwater if a chemical reaction involving oxygen is taking place:

http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/12/20/rec.athome.facts/index.html

4 Then Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Meyers (Joint Chiefs of staff Chairman) confirms that four very large exercises involving our air defenses were taking place exactly when the hijacked planes were headed to their targets. The exercises were designed to simulate hijacked planes being used as weapons to fly into buildings:

Cynthia McKinney Nails RUMSFELD with Hard Questions

5 NIST never explains what happened during the collapse of the twin towers themselves. They instead refer to a speculative paper written by an independent civil engineer and released on September 13, 2001: “Why did the World Trade Center collapse? A simple analysis”

6 Perhaps one of the most compelling pieces of evidence is David Chandler’s narrated slow motion video of the North Tower collapsing. It clearly shows that large portions of the building were being destroyed below the so-called “crush zone” as the building was demolished. The top of the building, which NIST says was responsible for crushing the rest of the building, is conspicuously absent. I wonder why footage of the collapses was banned from mainstream broadcasts just a few days after the event. Was it out of respect for those who lost their loved ones in the collapses? Or was it because it revealed something about the real mechanism of destruction?


North Tower Exploding by David Chandler

7 The Twin towers underwent a massive elevator renovation in the months prior to 9/11. Destruction of the central columns was necessary to destroy the twin towers in this manner. The central columns housed the elevator shafts: Twin tower elevator renovation.

8 Official testimony of 118 Firefighters who all saw, heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the twin towers. NIST never bothered to check if there were explosive residues in the dust despite these eye-witness testimonies, yet they unequivocally stated that there were no reports of explosions: Firefighter testimonies

9 Dozens of Mainstream media platforms reported explosive events in the buildings:

9/11: A Coincidence Theory that will not die

I thought this was interesting as well. Most Republicans don’t seem interested in  questioning 9/11. They actually mimic the Democrats position on Climate Change. Both positions are based on Faith and not Reason

The Mysteriousness of Conspiracy

Question Everything, Not just that which you do not wish to believe